Infectious Complications Associated to Buttonhole Cannulation of Native Arteriovenous Fistulas: A 22-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Buttonhole cannulation of native arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) appears associated with an increased infectious risk. We previously reported a dramatic increase in the incidence of infectious events after shift to buttonhole in an in-center hemodialysis unit, largely reduced after staff (re)education regarding strict respect of the procedure. We assessed the evolution over the following 12-years period in our center. METHODS: In this prospective follow-up of a previous, pre (rope-ladder)-post (buttonhole) comparison (2001-2010), all in-center hemodialysis patients with a native AVF were included from July 1st, 2010 to December 31st, 2022. Primary and secondary outcomes were infectious events (unexplained bacteraemia due to skin bacteria and/or local AVF infection) and complicated infectious events (metastatic infection, AVF surgery, death). Overall, the impact of several quality improvement strategies was tested according to the events rate over 6 periods: 1: Rope-ladder in all; 2: switch to buttonhole; 3: buttonhole in all, before workshops; 4: buttonhole in all, after workshops; 5: buttonhole withdrawal in problematic AVFs; 6: additional procedural changes. RESULTS: This extended observation period allowed adding 195,180 AVF-days to our previous report. Overall, 381,661 AVF-days (366 AVFs, 345 patients) were analysed. After an increase of the infectious events rate in 2012, the shift to rope-ladder in problematic AVFs during Period 5 did not have a significant impact. The incidence of infectious events decrease significantly during Period 6 compared to Periods 3, 4 and 5 [IRR 0.24 (95%CI 0.09-0.52) p=0.0001, IRR 0.22 (95%CI 0.09-0.47) p<0.0001, and IRR 0.29 (95%CI 0.11-0.66) p=0.001, respectively] and became eventually for the first time comparable to Period 1 [IRR 0.59 (95%CI 0.21-1.62) p=0.27]. CONCLUSION: The constant observance of reinforced hygiene protocols by trained staff and central coordination succeeded in significantly mitigating the infectious risk associated with buttonhole.

Dynamics of spreading of SARS-CoV-2 in a Belgian hemodialysis facility: The importance of the analysis of viral strains.

In-center maintenance hemodialysis (HD) patients are at high risk of acquiring coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by cross-contamination inside the unit. The aim of this study was to assess retrospectively the dynamics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission during the very first pandemic phase (March-July 2020) in a cohort of in-center maintenance HD patients and in nurses the same HD facility, using a phylogenetic approach. All SARS-CoV-2 quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction positive patients and nurses from our HD unit-respectively 10 out of 98, and 8 out of 58- and two other positive patients dialyzed in our self-care unit were included. Whole-genome viral sequencing and phylogenetic analysis supported the cluster investigation. Five positive patients were usually dialyzed in the same room and same shift before their COVID-19 diagnosis was made. Viral sequencing performed on 4/5 patients' swabs showed no phylogenetic link between their viruses. The fifth patient (whose virus could not be sequenced) was dialyzed at the end of the dialysis room and was treated by a different nurse than the one in charge of the other patients. Three nurses shared the same virus detected in both self-care patients (one of them had been transferred to our in-center facility). The epidemiologically strongly suspected intra-unit cluster could be ruled out by viral genome sequencing. The infection control policy did not allow inter-patient contamination within the HD facility, in contrast to evidence of moderate dissemination within the nursing staff and in the satellite unit. Epidemiologic data without phylogenetic confirmation might mislead the interpretation of the dynamics of viral spreading within congregate settings.

Infectious complications following conversion to buttonhole cannulation of native arteriovenous fistulas: a quality improvement report.

BACKGROUND: Constant-site or buttonhole cannulation of native arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) has gained in popularity compared with rope-ladder cannulation. However, cannulating nonhealed skin might increase the risk of (AVF-related) infectious events, as suggested by small reports. STUDY DESIGN: Quality improvement report. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: All patients on in-center hemodialysis therapy using a native AVF from January 1, 2001, to June 30, 2010. QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN: Shift to buttonhole cannulation between August 2004 and January 2005. Because the infectious event rate increased after the shift, educational workshops were held in May 2008 for all nurses, with review of every step of buttonhole protocol. OUTCOMES: Infectious events (unexplained bacteremia caused by skin bacteria and/or local AVF infection) and complicated infectious events (resulting in metastatic infection, death, or AVF surgery) were ascertained during 4 periods: (1) rope-ladder technique in all, (2) switch to buttonhole, (3) buttonhole in all before workshops, and (4) buttonhole in all after workshops. RESULTS: 177 patients (aged 70.4 ± 11.5 years) with 193 AVFs were analyzed, including 186,481 AVF-days. 57 infectious events occurred (0.31 events/1,000 AVF-days). The incidence of infectious events increased after the switch to the buttonhole method (0.17 [95% CI, 0.086-0.31], 0.11 [95% CI, 0.0014-0.63], and 0.43 [95% CI, 0.29-0.61] events/1,000 AVF-days in periods 1, 2, and 3, respectively; P = 0.003). This reached significance during only the second full year of buttonhole cannulation. During period 4, the incidence tended to decrease (0.34 events/1,000 AVF-days). Complicated infectious events (n = 12) were virtually restricted to period 3 (n = 11; 0.153 [95% CI, 0.076-0.273] events/1,000 AVF-days), with a significant decrease in period 4 (n = 1; 0.024 [95% CI, 0.001-0.118] events/1,000 AVF-days; RR for period 3 vs period 4, 6.37 [95% CI, 1.09-138.4]; P = 0.04). LIMITATIONS: Observational partly retrospective design. CONCLUSION: Intensive staff education regarding strict protocol for the buttonhole procedure was associated with a decrease in infectious events.

Falls in hemodialysis patients: prospective study of incidence, risk factors, and complications.

BACKGROUND: Falls are common in elderly nonuremic patients and are associated with poor outcomes. Recent international guidelines recommend proper assessment of fallers and those at risk for falling to implement multidimensional preventative strategies. Surprisingly, the incidence, risk factors, and complications of falls in hemodialysis (HD) patients are unknown despite the growing number of elderly patients on HD therapy worldwide. METHODS: We contacted all patients from 7 Belgian in-center HD units. Consenting patients were evaluated in March 2001 for the presence of risk factors for falling (demographics, selected comorbid conditions, gait/balance tests, main biochemical markers, and drug and HD regimens). Falls (including circumstances and derived complications) subsequently were recorded by staff members of all 7 units for 8 weeks from April 1, 2001, through questioning of patients, relatives, and caregivers. Fractures consecutive to falls were recorded for 12 months. RESULTS: Three-hundred eight patients agreed to participate (acceptance rate, 94%). They had a median age of 70.9 years (56% men, 27% patients with diabetes). Thirty-nine patients (12.7%) with a median age of 74.7 years fell at least once during the 8 weeks (total, 56 falls), an average incidence of 1.18 fall/patient-year. One third of the falls caused lesions requiring health care or even hospitalization (n = 6). During 12 months, 12 patients (3.9%) experienced a fall-related fracture. Logistic regression identified older age (odds ratio, 1.057/y; P = 0.01), diabetes (odds ratio, 2.747; P = 0.02), high number of prescribed oral drugs (odds ratio, 1.19/drug; P = 0.011), antidepressant use (odds ratio, 5.263; P < 0.001), and failing to walk 10 m without help (odds ratio, 2.057; P = 0.001) as independent risk factors for falling. CONCLUSION: Falls are common in in-center HD patients. The high-risk population delineated by our logistic model appears as a priority target for intervention studies (including exercise programs and more selective prescription of some drugs in particular) to reduce the incidence and complications of falls.